Skip to main content

A back story

 

When I began my MSc at Oxford in 2015, I never thought my journey would take me to a DPhil, and never imagined that if it did, it would be in the developmental trajectory of listening. Still, the presentation of a single study – Graham & Macaro (2008) – peaked my interest as I saw the relevance of the research questions to my own context as a teacher of French in an English secondary school. A Master’s dissertation about the experiences of listening to French as a lower intermediate English learner (Simpson, 2017) showed me the excitement of trying to grasp what happens in the listener’s mind when they hear French, with all the intriguing nuances that this brings.

A rainy evening in the university library at the start of my DPhil. The full-time students have long since gone home, and another paper captures my imagination. For practical reasons I am doing the DPhil part-time, and continuing to work, and want to make a virtue of my part-time status by looking at the progress of listening over as long as possible. While reading around longitudinal research, I come across Larsen-Freeman (2006) which simultaneously introduces me to Complex Dynamic Systems Theory and brings alive four case studies, telling a story of their learning which inspires me on an academic and a professional level. As a teacher I had often been left feeling frustrated with research which presented two variables: one dependent and one independent, as I knew instinctively that learning was not that simple. Complexity made much more intuitive sense as I knew the myriad ways in which my own students’ learning was impacted. Putting these two ideas together, the present study was born.

Working on the thesis was a labour of love over nearly seven years. It has been exciting, frightening, surprising, motivating, upsetting, challenging but never boring. It astonishes me that the project is now over. This blog is an attempt to turn the academic thesis into something that makes sense to teachers. It steps out of the ivory towers and Oxford's dreaming spires, and into the messy reality of a typical languages classroom. 


References: 

Graham, S., & Macaro, E. (2008). Strategy instruction in listening for low-intermediate learners of French. Language Learning, 58(4), 7470783.

Larsen-Freeman, D. (2006). The emergence of complexity, fluency, and accuracy in the oral and written production of five Chinese learners of english. Applied Linguistics, 27(4), 590–619. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/aml029

Simpson, K. (2017). Can speech stream segmentation instruction improve listening comprehension and listening self-efficacy in lower intermediate learners? Oxford. available here: https://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:2fff1b50-db92-44db-bb00-b8f908685f8b


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

How listening isn’t reading - and where that might take us

As I said to my daughter ‘I’m going to write a blog about how listening isn’t reading’, she said ‘well, obviously.’ But of course there’s a lot more to it than that. The types of tasks that are set in the language classroom (regardless of target language) might well suggest that listening tasks are identical to reading tasks, with the only difference that the passages are heard by the student rather than read. In my context - teaching French, German and occasionally Spanish to students in an English secondary school, one would be forgiven to assume, therefore, that listening is simply ‘heard reading’. And indeed, the types of passages that my students are exposed to from the exercise books and then in the exams, this is largely the case (a little bit less than it was, perhaps, but still largely the case). The inherent wrongness of this approach is fodder for a different blog post and will no doubt form a thread throughout all the posts on this blog. So rather than dipping into what on ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Learning to listen and listening to learn

This week I want to dig into the purpose of listening in our language lessons, and where that takes us When I first started teaching, I was using Studio for French and Echo for German (later on I started to teach Spanish too, and worked from Viva). I noticed even in my training year the pattern whereby a set of vocabulary and grammar was the learning outcome for the double page spread. To start with this would be introduced passively - it seemed to alternate between a bit of reading and a bit of listening first, and then the other would come. Then the students would be expected to produce what they had learned.  It struck me as making perfect sense: the students were very clearly listening to learn whatever the language point(s) were for that particular lesson or series of lessons.  So one of the key reasons why we listen, then, is to learn. From a language-learning point of view, that might be listening to learn the language, like the example I have just given above. Or, mor...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Comprehension Approach

 ‘Now, class, we’re going to do some listening. Everyone quiet’. The teacher shares a task - perhaps a series of questions to answer, perhaps a series of statements to which the student needs to dichotomise (true / false. Positive / negative. Bob / Katie). Then the teacher presses play on their device, and students listen - probably twice - and note down answers.  Finally the teacher recaps. Some might simply give the ‘answers’ (more later on why this is in inverted commas), others might elicit answers from students in various ways. Some might ask the students to note a mark out of five in their books. And then we move on to another task (frequently a speaking exercise in which the students are asked to produce output similar to what they have just heard.) This is a scenario played out in language lessons across the world. It’s what John Field calls ‘The Comprehension Approach’ in his 2008 book Listening in the Language Classroom. (An aside. It’s a brilliant book, rigorous...
Post a Comment
Read more